Black Box Testing and White Box Testing
Black Box Testing and White Box Testing
Black box testing is a way of testing software without looking at its internal code or design. Testers check if the software works as expected by using the requirements and specifications. They enter data, watch the outputs, and see how the system responds, including how fast and reliable it is.
This method can be used at many levels of testing, like unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing, but it’s mostly used in higher-level tests. Testers don’t need coding knowledge—they just focus on whether the software does what it should from the user’s perspective.
It’s also called specification-based testing or closed box testing because it only looks at what the software does, not how it does it.
Types of black box testing
Black box testing encompasses various types, each tailored to address specific aspects of the software. Here are some common types of black box testing.
Functional Testing
This testing checks if the software works according to its requirements. Testers give inputs and check if the outputs are correct.
For example, testing a login page:
Enter valid username and password, then click "Login" to see if it logs in and redirects properly.
Enter wrong credentials and check if an error message appears.
Leave fields empty and verify that the correct error message shows up.
This ensures the login works correctly in different cases.
Non-Functional Testing
This tests how well the software performs, rather than what it does. It looks at things like speed, usability, reliability, security, and how many users it can handle at once. For example, checking if the system can handle many users logging in at the same time or if the interface is easy to use.
Regression Testing
When the software is updated or fixed, regression testing checks that old features still work properly. It retests existing functions to make sure nothing broke after changes were made.
Black box testing techniques
Black box testing employs several techniques to ensure comprehensive test coverage
Equivalence Partitioning
This technique divides input data into different groups or partitions where all values are expected to be treated the same by the system. Instead of testing every possible input, you test just one value from each group, saving time while still covering all scenarios. For example, if a system handles ages below 18 differently from ages 18 and above, you test one age from each group rather than every age.
Boundary Value Analysis
This method focuses on testing inputs at the edges or boundaries of allowed input ranges because errors often happen there. For example, if valid ages are between 18 and 30, test cases would include values like 17, 18, 30, and 31 to check how the system handles inputs just outside and exactly at the limits.
Decision Table Testing
Decision table testing is a method that uses a table to organize different combinations of inputs and their expected outcomes. This helps testers cover all possible scenarios systematically and reduces the chances of missing any case.
For example, in a login system where users enter an email and password:
- If both email and password are correct, the user is allowed to access the home page.
- If either is incorrect, an appropriate error message is shown.
A decision table for this might look like:
Email Correct? | Email Incorrect? | Password Correct? | Password Incorrect? | Outcome |
Yes | No | Yes | No | User goes to home page |
Yes | No | No | Yes | "Incorrect password" |
No | Yes | Yes | No | "Incorrect email" |
No | Yes | No | Yes | "Incorrect email" |
Using decision tables helps testers ensure they test every possible input combination and the related system behavior efficiently.
State Transition Testing
This testing checks how a system changes states based on different inputs. It ensures the system behaves correctly during each transition.
For example, in an ATM:
- Starts at Waiting for card insertion.
- Moves to Card Inserted when a card is inserted.
- Goes to PIN Entered after correct PIN input.
- Proceeds to Transaction Initiated when a transaction is selected.
- Ends at Transaction Completed after finishing the transaction.
It tests all possible states and transitions to catch errors in state changes.
Error Guessing
Error guessing is an informal testing technique where testers use their experience and intuition to find defects that formal tests might miss. It relies on knowledge of common developer mistakes and software behavior to guess where errors might occur. For example, testers might check how the system handles null values or looks for security issues in user input. This approach helps find hidden bugs and improve overall software quality.
Exploratory Testing
Exploratory testing is an informal approach where testers design and execute tests at the same time, without pre-written test cases. Testers use their knowledge and skills to explore the software, find bugs, and check functionality in real-time. This method helps uncover issues missed by structured testing and speeds up feedback and documentation. It is especially useful for new team members learning the system quickly or when fast testing and feedback are needed.
White box Testing
White box testing focuses on examining the internal workings of a system, such as the code, architecture, and integration with other systems. It is important in automated processes like continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD). This testing uncovers security issues, code paths, and vulnerabilities that black box testing might miss. However, it requires testers to have strong skills in coding and understanding system design. Combining white box with black box testing gives a more complete evaluation of software quality.
Types of white box testing
White box testing encompasses various types, each designed for specific purposes within the testing process.
Unit Testing:
Unit testing verifies individual parts of software to ensure they work correctly. It’s done early and usually automated to catch problems quickly before combining components.
Integration Testing:
Integration testing checks how different parts of a software work together. It finds problems that happen when modules are combined and makes sure they work correctly as a group. For example, it tests if a web app and database communicate properly. This testing happens after individual parts are tested separately.
Difference between Black box Testing and White box Testing
Aspect | Black box testing | White box testing |
Technical knowledge | Requires minimal technical knowledge | Demands substantial technical expertise |
Programming skills | No programming skills required | Necessitates programming proficiency |
Understanding system details | Focuses on system behavior | Requires in-depth understanding of code |
Outsourcing | Easily outsourced | Often performed in-house |
Test design efficiency | Quick test design as it mimics user behavior | May involve longer test design processes |
Code coverage | Limited code coverage | Achieves comprehensive code coverage |
Cost | Cost-effective | Incurs higher costs due to specialists |
Root cause analysis | Challenging to pinpoint issues | Easier identification of root causes |
Testing perspective | Focuses on validating user experience | Analyzes code structure, conditions, paths |
Reporting detail | Provides concise reports | Generates detailed, granular reports |
Time efficiency | Streamlined testing process | Requires more time for thorough examination |
Algorithm testing | Unsuitable for algorithm testing | Well-suited for algorithm validation |
Tester profile | Typically performed by testers | Primarily conducted by developers |
Time requirement | Relatively quicker testing phase | Demands more time for comprehensive checks |
Basis of testing | Rooted in external expectations | Based on internal coding and structure |
Purpose | Validates business needs and requirements | Ensures code quality and integrity. |
Drawbacks | Difficult to automate; potential missed paths | Higher costs |
Error detection | Focuses on system behavior | Detects hidden bugs, optimizing code |
In short, White box testing focuses on the internal structure and code of the software, helping find hidden issues and improve security. Black box testing checks the software’s functionality from the user’s perspective without looking at the code. Together, they provide a complete approach to ensure software quality.
Comments
Post a Comment